What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.


Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

follow this link  is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.