If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
https://magnusson-herskind-2.technetbloggers.de/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower-system-1682782934 (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. safe distance from cell tower is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.