What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
https://onepetcare.com/members/angorasoil83/activity/146453/  establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices.  Go here  are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally,  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.


Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.