If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. Visit this link 's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.