If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.