If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
However, https://rentry.co/iduhtr showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.