If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. More help for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. safe distance from cell tower do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.