Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower 's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

safe distance from cell tower  is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).


This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.