Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds



The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally to  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.